Skip to main content

The Seven-Minute New York Times Magazine Workout

I'm sure many of you have heard of a recent New York Times Magazine article about a seven-minute workout that claims to "prolong endurance."

From the article: "...it fulfills the latest mandates for high-intensity effort, which essentially combines a long run and a visit to the weight room into about seven minutes of steady discomfort."

You'll need a mat and a sturdy chair for this workout.  I had a wall and staircase near me, which I used instead of a chair.  The seven minutes consists of 12 moves, each done for 30 seconds with a 10-second break.  The break is just long enough to prepare for the next movement.  Along with proper form, you should be aiming for 80% intensity/discomfort.

To make things easier, Lifehacker actually made a neat iPhone app for it (here's a web version).



So I tried this workout, six times.  In a row (that's about 42 minutes, maybe a touch more).  I wanted to do one more, but as I may have mentioned on here, I don't have a lot of time to work out these days, so I couldn't fit in another second.  And frankly, I was getting a little bored of repeating 12 moves over and over.

The workout overall is not too strenuous on the joints yet kept my heart rate steadily up and made me sweat.  It's definitely challenging, particularly for beginners -- consider how difficult it can be to do "rotating push-ups."  By about the third go-around, doing push-ups for 30 seconds was an effort for sure.

I definitely feel like most of my major muscle groups were hit in this workout.  The distribution of upper body, lower body, and core was pretty even.  There is a little cardio thrown in, as well.

Do I think this will improve my endurance?  No... but maybe because I'm an Insanity gal.  I was never winded, though it did get difficult in the "holding" moves (wall sit, plank, side plank, etc.) after a while.  Also, if I had to guess (because my heart rate monitor is currently out of batteries), I think I may have burned about 300 (most likely fewer) calories doing this workout -- again, pushing to 80% effort.  So while this is a good thing to do to target muscles and make yourself more "even," I don't see this as a miracle weight-loss workout or anything.  This isn't what it's claiming to be, though.

But seven minutes is definitely accessible to most people, and because you don't really need equipment, it's do-able in most places.  You could easily add this to your current routine and feel good that you've trained muscles that you may normally overlook.

------
Link: http://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/05/09/the-scientific-7-minute-workout/?ref=magazine

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Giveaway Winner! -- Sony W Series MP3 Player (Update)

Updated Post: 3/20/11 As promised, here are the Sony W Series giveaway winners: -- both have been contacted and prizes sent -- Please e-mail me at (Gmail) Nobel4Lit2 with your addresses, and I'll ship out the units soon! Thanks to everyone who entered.  Stay tuned for another giveaway soon (maybe later this week)! (Note: I ended up putting everyone's retweets starting after the comments when it came to numbering the entries.) Original Post: 3/10/11 Sunday, March 20 2011, the day I will run LA Marathon for the 4th time (and embark on my 8th 26.2 journey overall), will also be very special because it will mark the 5th year since I did my FIRST training run with the intention of running a marathon.  (Check out that life-changing post HERE ). Yep, on March 20, 2006, I went to the track and ran my first 3.25 miles with the dreams of marathon glory (or even half-marathon glory). I think it was one of the best decisions I've ever made.  I was a sprint/track

Sharkies Prize Pack (giveaway)

It's giveaway time! On a long run recently, I took a couple packs of Sharkies Organic Sports Chews  with me to keep me going on a hot day.  I got through those 15 miles  eating these, versus normal gels.  I've been opting to eat chews over gels in my running nowadays because I just find them more palatable and easier on my stomach for some reason.  Plus, they do pack a few more calories, which is a good thing in this case. I normally associate cute little chews with candy, but these actually contain natural electrolytes.  Plus, they were light to carry and very tasty, too!  Each pack is about 140 calories.  The only downside I found to the sport chews is that they stuck to my teeth a tiny bit more than my normal choices, and the packaging gave me a fight at times.  This could easily be solved by conslidating them into a baggie pre-run, or eating them BEFORE running would be much easier than during. Want to win the prize pack below?  It comes with these Sport Chews, a neat

Rebecca Michaels Performance Clothing (Giveaway)

UPDATE: 6/21/12 -- This giveaway is closed, and the winner is #43, Jacqueline!!  I will contact you, but if you miss it, please e-mail me! ------ I'd like to credit in advance "The Ukrainian" who helped me stage some photos for this post. =) Perhaps because I don't dress well when working out, I was offered the opportunity to try some fun pieces from the Rebecca Michaels summer collection. Since I complained about my issues with headbands staying on my head, I also got to try their Violet Love headbands.  "The Ukrainian" didn't hesitate in throwing one on, and I think he said he looks like Rambo in it. Anyway, I'll start with my experience with the headbands .  They are very soft and actually look SUPER cute on!  They also cover a large portion of the top of your head, so those little fly-aways don't come drooping down.  Or is that just me?  My hair is normally cut in layers, so I do experience this quite a bit. Unfortun